President Muhammadu Buhari’s Victory at the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal on September 11th, 2019, may be short-lived following a 66 grounds of appeal filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate in the last presidential election, Atiku Abubakar, at the Supreme Court.
Atiku and the PDP had faulted the decision of the Justice Mohammed Garba led panel which held that Buhari did not need to attach his academic certificates to the INEC’s form CF 001 before he can stand for the presidential election.
However, the All Progressives Congress, APC, has reacted to Atiku's appeal by asking the Supreme Court to expunge allegation of electoral malpractices and existence of INEC server which formed part of the record of the presidential election petition tribunal that heard the petition on 2019 presidential poll.
This is contained the cross-appeal filed by APC against the decision of the tribunal which admitted the report and evidences of the three data analysts who testified for the petitioners at the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal and whose evidences was admitted by the tribunal in the interest of natural justice.
In the cross appeal filed by its lead counsel, Prince Lateef Olasunkanmi Fagbemi (SAN), the party wants the Supreme Court to expunge the evidence of the three Information Communication and Technology (ICT) experts who testified on the existence of server allegedly used by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to store results of the February 23 presidential election.
The three key witnesses are Segun Sowunmi, a Media Aide to Atiku, David Njoga, a Kenyan and Joseph Gbenga who are famous data analysts and employed by Atiku to carry out forensic analysis of the presidential election results.
They had in their testimony informed the tribunal that they analyzed presidential election results state by state and found discrepancies in the results credited to Atiku and President Muhammadu Buhari.
Specifically, the three data analysts alleged that in the results sheets they analyzed the votes of Atiku were deliberately depleted while that of Buhari and APC were inflated.
The Kenyan expert in his evidence specifically insisted that INEC used the server which he claimed to have penetrated to obtain the alleged authentic results of the February 23 presidential election which ran counter to the one declared by the electoral body.
APC also in the cross appeal pleaded with the Supreme Court for an order setting aside the evidence of the three witnesses and the documents including video clips tendered through them from the bar.
It argued that the tribunal erred in law when it held that the evidence and the documents of the three witnesses were considered in the interest of natural justice.
APC further submitted that the decision of the tribunal on the point was untenable on the grounds that the issue of admissibility or otherwise of a document is a point of law and not natural justice as erroneously held by the tribunal.
As for allegations of electoral malpractices in 10 states of the federation, the party (APC) submitted that the allegations are vague and not specific as required by law. They therefore, want it expunged since the petitioners did not state the specific polling units were the alleged fraud were committed.
